Civ 5 expansions add more depth and systems to the base game, whereas Civ 6 expansions add new civilizations and an environmental system.

Civ 5 has more realistic graphics, whereas Civ 6 graphics are more stylized and brightly hued.

Civ 5 is more challenging, with penalties such as cultural and scientific, whereas Civ 6 is more unitive and easier to learn.

I’ll give my honest opinion about which game is better– no matter what you value most. So is Civ 5 really better, as so many players contend, or is Civ 6 really the superior, but an underrated game?Ĭonsider this your guide to Civ 5 vs Civ 6. But the truth is that Civ 5 and Civ 6 are simply different– on face value, first distinguished by cartoonish vs more realistic graphics.īut it goes beyond graphics: players are seemingly torn between Civ 5 vs Civ 6 for a bevy of reasons, from civilizations offered, to world maps, technology, culture, lore, and more. The post in question was a snapshot of a channel in Civ 5, and many were taken aback by the style, enough that some thought the channel was constructed using a Civ 5 mod. In a glance at just one reason why fans are still playing Civ 5 and looking up overviews and guides, a Reddit post highlighted Civ 5 graphics vs Civ 6 graphics– capturing not only player’s interest in the older art style, but perhaps the longevity of a game that came out more than a decade ago. Civ 6 may have been out now for over half a decade, but that hasn’t stopped Civilization fans from returning to Civ 5– and many fans debating if Civ 5 or Civ 6 is the best game.

Civilization 5 brazil